Just finished my presentation for the School and Community Relations Class EDLD 5326 and thought I would add it to the blog. Enjoy!
Timbercreek/Tipps Tiger Tutoring Program
Followers
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Thursday, December 20, 2012
My 5301 Reflection
As I reflect on the last 5 weeks of this
course, so much comes to mind. The
amount of information we covered was definitely enough to keep me busy. But the information was very beneficial and
important in the continuing growth toward administration. My plan in this reflection assignment is to
talk about each of the above listed bullets individually and then any other
stuff I feel was important I will discuss as well.
Lectures
I honestly did not get much out of the
lectures. They fulfilled the purpose of
putting into words what was expected each week, but there was not much insight
to them in my opinion. I can certainly
tell that Dr. Aterbury, and Dr. Jenkins are both very experienced men in the
field of Educational Leadership. Though
their videos did provide some strategies and best practices, I still feel they
provided no real “meat” for the course.
If I was to include the web conferences
with Dr. Abshire as a lecture then I could say I gained quite a bit of
knowledge from the lectures. I made sure
to attend the weekly web conferences at the scheduled times each week as I have
found that even if I do not have any questions, someone else will, and I will
want to know the answer! I have also
found that when I participate I tend to be more vested in the lessons and gain
more insight. Dr. Abshire’s web conferences were my main source of insight on
best practices and how to best approach each step of the action research
process.
Readings
Of the required sections of reading from
the Dana text and the Harris et al text, I did gain a lot of knowledge about
best practices for completing an action research project as well as some good
pointers on ways to have more success in the process.
Though it does not pertain to my action
research currently Figure 1.1 from the Dana text, The Druthers Survey (Dana pg.
17) is going to be a tool that I will use when I get into administration to
gain as much information or insight from my staff as possible. The staff of a school is the eyes and
ears. They know what is wrong and what
is right on the campus and I believe they should be able to provide possible
suggestions or opinions as to what could be “fixed.” The information provided in the Dana text
will definitely be apart of my professional library and a tool that I will be
referring to in the future as action research is needed on my campus.
Though the Dana text provides several
examples of action research projects from administrators around the country,
the Harris et al text is a great supplemental book. It provides in-depth step by step information
that will not only help the reader get to a more precise outcome, but also
allow the reader to grow and learn more about themselves throughout the action
research process. The Harris et al text
really focuses on getting the reader to know themselves more and what they want
to get out of gaining any information they may gather along the way. Reflection is a powerful tool and will only
help me to grow stronger more motivated and more invested in my project.
Searches, like electronic
searches of topics and questions
I did not really need to use electronic
searches to find any topics or answer any of my questions. I did use the search to find research on my
specific action research topic to find out how or what others had done in the
past. I found a Lamar student had done
an action research similar to mine and was very good about posting information
on her blog about her findings. I also
found a dissertation someone had written that was published in an online
magazine.
Assignments and activities
The best way to learn is to do. I am totally a kinesthetic learner so hands
on is what works for me. In actually
having to sit down and type up an outline for my project and meeting with my
site supervisor to gain insight into what I could do to make it better for
myself as well as our school.
Discussion Board
Gaining insight from my peers is always a
bonus. I have never had a problem
putting my opinion out there for better or worse to be critiqued by
others. I felt that all who commented on
my posts to the discussion board were fair and professional. I am glad that it is a part of each course to
use the discussion board as it gives us a chance to see what others are doing
or how other are interpreting the information we receive weekly. In hearing from others, we can allow
ourselves to add that insight to our own and will only make our projects
stronger.
Blogs
I had never “blogged” before this
class or read a blog before this class.
But it is a valuable tool. Like
the discussion board, our blog provides a platform to present our “masterpiece”
on. Others view it and tell us how they
feel we can make it better or not. It
also provides a timeline of events for future reference or reflection time.
Overall,
I am excited to get another course completed and gain another notch in the belt
of administration. I feel I have a much
better understanding of how to best complete an action research project as well
as use reflection to my benefit.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
My Site Supervisor meeting from 12/12/12 at 12:12pm
I met with my site supervisor on 12/12/12 at 12:12 just
because it is fun to say that. We actually met at noon. My site supervisor Michele already had a copy
of my draft action research plan that she had already made a few notes on.
Overall, she felt
my plan is strong, but the layout of my plan was “all over the place.” I had my time frames of when I was completing
different tasks out of order and so she recommended that I put them in order to
have a better flow to the plan. I agree
and made a note to change this. She also
mentioned that in my goal I did write out that PBIS stands for Positive
Behavior Interventions and Supports, which the reader may need to know in order
to see purpose in my action research.
Again, noted to be corrected and we moved on.
Michele decided
to play “Devil’s Advocate” with me next. In my second action step of
determining staff perception she asked me, “What if you find the answers from
the staff do not correlate with the student data? What if it seems the teachers
choose to answer your survey based on what you want to hear and not their
actual perception of the program?” My
response was that I would let the teachers know my purpose and that this data
was not shared with administration and honestly, I would not know who said what
either as the survey is online and anonymous.
Also as a back-up plan Michele suggested that she could give me access
to the Administrative walkthroughs as well as district personnel walkthroughs
to see if they are seeing what the teacher/staff say they are doing in the
survey. Again this would be anonymous
and would give me another piece of data to show perception not only of staff,
but also what district administration is seeing.
As we did not
make AYP this last year, our staff has been asked to put more emphasis on
keeping students engaged in the lessons.
Using the information from the administrative and district personnel
walkthroughs, I can see if there is a correlation between student engagement
and behavior issues.
Michele’s next
recommendation was to also look at my school’s 2010-2011 overall office
referral data as well as the specific infractions to compare with the 2011-2012
and 2012-2013 data I am already collecting.
This would give me a baseline for if/how much we have improved based on
percentages of referrals to number of students that year. This would also require me working with the
registrar to get the numbers for our school at the end of each of the school
years.
In my step about
looking into the history of PBIS and literature about the program, Michele
suggested that I look into the program we had before call Building Better
Relationships or BBR. Look into why the
district decided to abandon this program for PBIS. I was intrigued by this after she mentioned
it as I enjoyed and was an avid user of BBR when it was our district program. She also recommended that I meet with our
current Behavior Interventionist, to get her take on where she fits in with
PBIS and its effectiveness.
Her last concern was how I left the PBIS
committee out of my action research plan.
As a committee it is our job to come up with solutions together. So instead of presenting to the staff, I am
going to present my findings to the PBIS committee first where we can
brainstorm possible solutions to present to our staff during our Fall
in-service day. As soon as she mentioned
this, it made much better sense for me to collaborate with my committee instead
of doing all this alone. It also lifted
a small stress I was having at the magnitude of the project I was presenting as
there would be others to help support me.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Updated Action Research Outline 12/12/12
Nick Clackley Action Research
Outline
|
||||
Goal: Measure the effectiveness of Positive Behavior Interventions and
Supports (PBIS) implementation at Tipps Elementary in Houston, Texas.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1.
Research history and literature of PBIS program.
-When district implemented program
What came before PBIS
-Look for Positives for PBIS
-Look for downfalls for PBIS
-Talk to Behavior Interventionist
about her role in PBIS.
|
-Self
-Behavior Interventionist
|
December 2012 / January 2013
|
-Internet access
-Region IV website
-Building Better Relationships
information
|
-Find information to support the good
this program can do for behavior management.
-After Behavior Interventionist
interview, make assumptions based on answers.
|
2. Determine staff perception of PBIS
-Create
online survey for staff to give their perception of PBIS program
-Administer
survey in January to get baseline.
-Administer
survey in December to find out if perceptions changed based on shared
findings.
-Collect
and analyze feedback from surveys and compare responses
|
-Self
-All
staff
|
Administer
in January 2013 and December of 2013
|
-survey
monkey online resource
|
-Use
data to find perceived strengths and weaknesses of the PBIS program-Devise
ideas to possibly increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share
findings during Fall 2013 in-service day.
-Determine
if/how changes affected staff perception of PBIS in second survey.
-In case staff data is skewed in
comparison to data, I will also focus on district walkthrough data
|
3. Analyze data from two previous school
years.
-Look for patterns or trends in the
2011-2012 school year behavior data.
-Document and share this information
with site supervisor and Behavior Interventionist.
|
-Self
-Site Supervisor
-Behavior Interventionist
|
December 2012 / January 2013
|
-CogNos Data
|
-Find trends that may be issues to
compare to current year data.
-Get feedback from site supervisor
and Behavior Interventionist.
|
4. Analyze data from current school year.
-Look for patterns or trends in the
2012-2013 school year behavior data.
-Document and share this information
with site supervisor and Behavior Interventionist.
|
-Self
-Site Supervisor
-Behavior Interventionist
|
May 2013 / June 2013
|
-CogNos Data
|
-Find trends that may be issues to
compare to current year data.
-Get feedback from site supervisor
and Behavior Interventionist.
|
5. Determine correlation between PBIS
and number of referrals in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 school years.
-Collect
discipline data from the district online system from previous school year and
current school year.
-Break
down data based on subpopulations (ethnicity, grade level, location type of infraction,
overall list of students, time of day.
-Break
down data based on behaviors and locations on campus incidents are
occurring.
|
-Self
-Behavioral
Interventionist
-Site
Supervisor
-PBIS
committee
|
-May
2013 / June 2013
|
-CogNos
access for discipline information
|
-Use
of data to identify patterns, trends, and areas of concern.
-Devise
ideas to possibly increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share
findings with PBIS committee
-Devise
ideas with PBIS committee.
-Share
findings during Fall 2013 in-service day.
|
6.
Create presentation for PBIS committee.
-Give background on where my inquiry
came about
-Share my action research process
-Share data findings and assertions
based on data
-Give my final thoughts
-Come up with ideas to present to
staff at in-service
|
-Self
-PBIS committee
-Site supervisor
|
-June 2013 / August 2013
|
-Power point
-CogNos Data
-staff survey data
|
-Based on my sharing, the committee
will suggest new structures to best meet the needs of students and staff at
Tipps.
|
7.
Present findings with committee to 2013-2014 staff.
-Give background on where my inquiry
came about
-Share my action research process
-Share data findings and assertions
based on data
-Give my final thoughts
|
-Self
-PBIS committee
-Staff
|
August 2013
|
-Power point
-CogNos Data
-staff survey data
|
-Based on my sharing, the committee
will suggest new structures to best meet the needs of students and staff at
Tipps.
-Staff will contribute their input on
possible changes as well.
-Staff determines new changes, if
any.
|
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
7.1 Tool Outline
|
Nick Clackley Action Research Outline
|
||||
|
Goal: Measure the effectiveness of PBIS implementation at Tipps Elementary
in Houston, Texas.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
1. Determine staff perception of PBIS
-Create online survey for
staff to give their perception of PBIS program
-Administer survey in
January to get baseline.
-Administer survey in
December to find out if perceptions changed based on shared findings.
-Collect and analyze
feedback from surveys and compare responses
|
-Self
-All staff
|
Administer in January 2013
and December of 2013
|
-survey monkey online
resource
|
-Use data to find
perceived strengths and weaknesses of the PBIS program
-Devise ideas to possibly
increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share findings during
Fall 2013 in-service day.
-Determine if/how changes
affected staff perception of PBIS in second survey.
|
|
2. Determine correlation between PBIS and number of
referrals in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 school years.
-Collect discipline data
from the district online system from previous school year and current school
year.
-Break down data based on
subpopulations (gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and grade
level)
-Break down data based on
behaviors and locations on campus incidents are occurring.
|
-Self
-Behavioral
Interventionist
-Site Supervisor
|
-September 2011 / June
2013
|
-CogNos access for
discipline information
|
-Use of data to identify
patterns, trends, and areas of concern.
-Devise ideas to possibly
increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share findings during
Fall 2013 in-service day.
|
|
3.
Create presentation for staff.
-Give background on where my inquiry
came about
-Share my action research process
-Share data findings and assertions
based on data
-Give my final thoughts
-Create an activity for staff to
develop or change PBIS structures to meet the needs of students and staff at
Tipps.
|
-Self
-PBIS committee
-Site supervisor
|
-June 2013 / August 2013
|
-Power point
-CogNos Data
-staff survey data
|
-Based on my sharing, the teachers
create or changes PBIS structure to best meet the needs of students and staff
at Tipps.
|
|
4.
Research history and literature of PBIS program.
-Look for Positives
-Look for downfalls
|
-Self
|
December 2012 / January 2013
|
-Internet access
-Region IV website
|
-Find information to support the good
this program can do for behavior management.
|
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
My Action Research Proposal
After meeting with my site supervisor and my principal, it has been determined that my action research project will focus on several areas of our discipline management program called Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS). This is the second year we have had PBIS at our campus, and I would like to know how/if it is working for our campus. We have just over 1,300 students, Pre-Kindergarten thru Fifth Grade at our campus in Houston, Texas.
I have 5 "wonderings" I wish to address. They are as follows:
- What is the correlation between the implementation of PBIS and the number of office referrals written in the past two school years?
- What is the largest behavior issue for the following groups?
- Gender
- Ethnicity
- Socioeconomic background
- Grade level
- Overall at my campus
- Where are the most office referrals occurring?
- What are the effects of PBIS on the “Red” students?
- What is the staff’s perception on the strengths and weaknesses of the PBIS program
In order to answer these wonderings I will
be comparing the discipline data from the past 2 years. I will be breaking the data down into the
above listed groups to compare and analyze as well. We have a very diverse population and I would
like to see how the behavior issues are breaking down so that our staff can
focus on best practices for meeting the needs of that specified group. With this data information I can determine
the most common behavior issue as well as where the most discipline issues are
occurring at our campus.
In PBIS there are 3 types of
students. Green students make up
approximately 80% of your school. They
are the students who have little to no discipline issues and are usually your
highest achieving students. Yellow
students make up approximately 15% of your school. They have some discipline issues, but their
good behavior tends to outweigh their bad behaviors. Red students make up approximately 5% of your
school. These are the students who
constantly cause class disruptions. They tend to have more poor behavior
choices than good. They spend quite a
bit of time outside the classroom dealing with behavior problems end missing
out on instruction time. The goal of
PBIS is the “Grow the Green.” If I am
able to determine patterns with the “Red” students, I may be able to find ways
to combat the cycle they have gotten into and move them into yellow and
eventually green.
As
PBIS is expected to be a shared vision by all employees and students at my
school, I would like to survey the staff on 2 separate occasions on some of
their perceptions or beliefs in the program.
Do they feel it is working, or not working? What are some of the good things? Bad things? Any changes they would like to make? Do they feel like PBIS is natural for them,
or are they having to work hard to keep it going in their classroom? Do they believe in the PBIS model? There are several questions that I will frame
much better upon using the survey. But
the overall goal is to find out if we are all still on the same page with PBIS.
With
this information, I will be able to present to my administration and staff what
data I found as well as some possible solutions on where the campus can make
some improvements. I plan to present
this information in the fall at the start of the 2013-2014 school year during
the first week in-service. With that
information at the time, we can make adjustments (if needed) in how our PBIS
model works to push to keeping students more attentive and off task less.
I know that was a lot in digest, but I feel there is a lot I can do with this information. Please let me know what you think my friends. I really do value your input and insight. Thanks
-Nick-
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Week 2 Reflections
This week, we
were asked to read about the 9 main categories of action research. Those
topics are Staff development, Curriculum development, Individual teacher(s), Individual
student(s), School culture/community, Leadership Management, School performance, and Social
justice or equity issues. One thing I found interesting was that it
seemed several of these topics overlapped in some ways. For example, if I
am looking at improving the reading levels for a group of my students, that
could be listed under individual students as well as social justice and school
performance. Not that it really matters which one we really use, but I
found that to be an interesting fact.
We were also asked to look through our internship plans to find 3 topics that could lead to a possible action research project to be conducted by us during this masters. After meeting with my site supervisor, I believe I have nailed down what I am going to do for my project. I just need to form my Wondering question as well as get the details together. Just so happens, that is our assignment for Week 3. Woohoo!
I hope everyone else is found a project they feel near and dear to as well, and I look forward to hearing about them next week. Enjoy the rest of your weekends!
-Nick-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)