This was the last
web conference for the EDLD 5397 course.
Dr. Borel, went over all of the assignments and what needed to be
uploaded to TK20 as well as turned in to Lamar.
One of the issues that I was having was checking on tk20 to make sure
that my field supervisor had documented our second web conference. For some reason I was not seeing a certain
tab, that I was having to click in order to make sure all my ducks are in a row
so that I do not receive an I in this course.
I feel that Dr. Borel did a great job of walking me through the program
as well as supporting us and all of our needs during this stressful time. She was able to roll with the punches when
issues occurred with tk20 and also explained all of the assignments quite in
detail. Though this was quite a
stressful course as we were all trying to catch up on things like the logs from
our internship as well as writing our draft action research report, I feel this
course came at the right time to keep us on track.
Nick Clackley's Action Research
Followers
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Action Research EDLD 5326 Reflection
To this point, I
have completed about one-third of the Action Research Project. Before I collected the student discipline
data, I did some research on what some of the other PBIS schools in my district
were doing to remain successful with the Positive Behavior Interventions and
Supports program in place. I found that
the schools with the most success had complete buy in to the program from
staff, students, and even parents were familiar with how it works so they can
implement at home if needed.
After speaking
with some of the other PBIS school coordinators, I began to dig into the
2010-2011 school year data to find some patterns in behavior. This was the year before we implemented to
PBIS program. I then looked at the data for the 2011-2012 school
year again looking for patterns to see if there were any that corresponded to
the previous year. This was our first
year as a PBIS school. Once I finished
analyzing this data, I began to look at the current school year data for
patterns, trends, and similarities thus far.
Using this
information, I created a survey for the teachers and staff of my campus to
answer. Many of these questions have to
do with their perception of program and how successful or unsuccessful they
feel the program is functioning. I plan
to administer this survey to the staff at the end of April. At this point the stresses of STAAR testing
will have passed, and I feel they will give me a better idea of how they really
feel about the program and possibly some changes they may think need to be
made.
With this
information and the student data, I will be able to go the PBIS committee with
a recommendation of what is needed as far as providing success with the PBIS
program.
There is still
much to be done, but I feel I am not track and ready to may a data-driven
recommendation to my staff that will foster a stronger bond and buy-in to the
PBIS program.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
My EDLD 5326 presentation
Just finished my presentation for the School and Community Relations Class EDLD 5326 and thought I would add it to the blog. Enjoy!
Timbercreek/Tipps Tiger Tutoring Program
Timbercreek/Tipps Tiger Tutoring Program
Thursday, December 20, 2012
My 5301 Reflection
As I reflect on the last 5 weeks of this
course, so much comes to mind. The
amount of information we covered was definitely enough to keep me busy. But the information was very beneficial and
important in the continuing growth toward administration. My plan in this reflection assignment is to
talk about each of the above listed bullets individually and then any other
stuff I feel was important I will discuss as well.
Lectures
I honestly did not get much out of the
lectures. They fulfilled the purpose of
putting into words what was expected each week, but there was not much insight
to them in my opinion. I can certainly
tell that Dr. Aterbury, and Dr. Jenkins are both very experienced men in the
field of Educational Leadership. Though
their videos did provide some strategies and best practices, I still feel they
provided no real “meat” for the course.
If I was to include the web conferences
with Dr. Abshire as a lecture then I could say I gained quite a bit of
knowledge from the lectures. I made sure
to attend the weekly web conferences at the scheduled times each week as I have
found that even if I do not have any questions, someone else will, and I will
want to know the answer! I have also
found that when I participate I tend to be more vested in the lessons and gain
more insight. Dr. Abshire’s web conferences were my main source of insight on
best practices and how to best approach each step of the action research
process.
Readings
Of the required sections of reading from
the Dana text and the Harris et al text, I did gain a lot of knowledge about
best practices for completing an action research project as well as some good
pointers on ways to have more success in the process.
Though it does not pertain to my action
research currently Figure 1.1 from the Dana text, The Druthers Survey (Dana pg.
17) is going to be a tool that I will use when I get into administration to
gain as much information or insight from my staff as possible. The staff of a school is the eyes and
ears. They know what is wrong and what
is right on the campus and I believe they should be able to provide possible
suggestions or opinions as to what could be “fixed.” The information provided in the Dana text
will definitely be apart of my professional library and a tool that I will be
referring to in the future as action research is needed on my campus.
Though the Dana text provides several
examples of action research projects from administrators around the country,
the Harris et al text is a great supplemental book. It provides in-depth step by step information
that will not only help the reader get to a more precise outcome, but also
allow the reader to grow and learn more about themselves throughout the action
research process. The Harris et al text
really focuses on getting the reader to know themselves more and what they want
to get out of gaining any information they may gather along the way. Reflection is a powerful tool and will only
help me to grow stronger more motivated and more invested in my project.
Searches, like electronic
searches of topics and questions
I did not really need to use electronic
searches to find any topics or answer any of my questions. I did use the search to find research on my
specific action research topic to find out how or what others had done in the
past. I found a Lamar student had done
an action research similar to mine and was very good about posting information
on her blog about her findings. I also
found a dissertation someone had written that was published in an online
magazine.
Assignments and activities
The best way to learn is to do. I am totally a kinesthetic learner so hands
on is what works for me. In actually
having to sit down and type up an outline for my project and meeting with my
site supervisor to gain insight into what I could do to make it better for
myself as well as our school.
Discussion Board
Gaining insight from my peers is always a
bonus. I have never had a problem
putting my opinion out there for better or worse to be critiqued by
others. I felt that all who commented on
my posts to the discussion board were fair and professional. I am glad that it is a part of each course to
use the discussion board as it gives us a chance to see what others are doing
or how other are interpreting the information we receive weekly. In hearing from others, we can allow
ourselves to add that insight to our own and will only make our projects
stronger.
Blogs
I had never “blogged” before this
class or read a blog before this class.
But it is a valuable tool. Like
the discussion board, our blog provides a platform to present our “masterpiece”
on. Others view it and tell us how they
feel we can make it better or not. It
also provides a timeline of events for future reference or reflection time.
Overall,
I am excited to get another course completed and gain another notch in the belt
of administration. I feel I have a much
better understanding of how to best complete an action research project as well
as use reflection to my benefit.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
My Site Supervisor meeting from 12/12/12 at 12:12pm
I met with my site supervisor on 12/12/12 at 12:12 just
because it is fun to say that. We actually met at noon. My site supervisor Michele already had a copy
of my draft action research plan that she had already made a few notes on.
Overall, she felt
my plan is strong, but the layout of my plan was “all over the place.” I had my time frames of when I was completing
different tasks out of order and so she recommended that I put them in order to
have a better flow to the plan. I agree
and made a note to change this. She also
mentioned that in my goal I did write out that PBIS stands for Positive
Behavior Interventions and Supports, which the reader may need to know in order
to see purpose in my action research.
Again, noted to be corrected and we moved on.
Michele decided
to play “Devil’s Advocate” with me next. In my second action step of
determining staff perception she asked me, “What if you find the answers from
the staff do not correlate with the student data? What if it seems the teachers
choose to answer your survey based on what you want to hear and not their
actual perception of the program?” My
response was that I would let the teachers know my purpose and that this data
was not shared with administration and honestly, I would not know who said what
either as the survey is online and anonymous.
Also as a back-up plan Michele suggested that she could give me access
to the Administrative walkthroughs as well as district personnel walkthroughs
to see if they are seeing what the teacher/staff say they are doing in the
survey. Again this would be anonymous
and would give me another piece of data to show perception not only of staff,
but also what district administration is seeing.
As we did not
make AYP this last year, our staff has been asked to put more emphasis on
keeping students engaged in the lessons.
Using the information from the administrative and district personnel
walkthroughs, I can see if there is a correlation between student engagement
and behavior issues.
Michele’s next
recommendation was to also look at my school’s 2010-2011 overall office
referral data as well as the specific infractions to compare with the 2011-2012
and 2012-2013 data I am already collecting.
This would give me a baseline for if/how much we have improved based on
percentages of referrals to number of students that year. This would also require me working with the
registrar to get the numbers for our school at the end of each of the school
years.
In my step about
looking into the history of PBIS and literature about the program, Michele
suggested that I look into the program we had before call Building Better
Relationships or BBR. Look into why the
district decided to abandon this program for PBIS. I was intrigued by this after she mentioned
it as I enjoyed and was an avid user of BBR when it was our district program. She also recommended that I meet with our
current Behavior Interventionist, to get her take on where she fits in with
PBIS and its effectiveness.
Her last concern was how I left the PBIS
committee out of my action research plan.
As a committee it is our job to come up with solutions together. So instead of presenting to the staff, I am
going to present my findings to the PBIS committee first where we can
brainstorm possible solutions to present to our staff during our Fall
in-service day. As soon as she mentioned
this, it made much better sense for me to collaborate with my committee instead
of doing all this alone. It also lifted
a small stress I was having at the magnitude of the project I was presenting as
there would be others to help support me.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Updated Action Research Outline 12/12/12
Nick Clackley Action Research
Outline
|
||||
Goal: Measure the effectiveness of Positive Behavior Interventions and
Supports (PBIS) implementation at Tipps Elementary in Houston, Texas.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1.
Research history and literature of PBIS program.
-When district implemented program
What came before PBIS
-Look for Positives for PBIS
-Look for downfalls for PBIS
-Talk to Behavior Interventionist
about her role in PBIS.
|
-Self
-Behavior Interventionist
|
December 2012 / January 2013
|
-Internet access
-Region IV website
-Building Better Relationships
information
|
-Find information to support the good
this program can do for behavior management.
-After Behavior Interventionist
interview, make assumptions based on answers.
|
2. Determine staff perception of PBIS
-Create
online survey for staff to give their perception of PBIS program
-Administer
survey in January to get baseline.
-Administer
survey in December to find out if perceptions changed based on shared
findings.
-Collect
and analyze feedback from surveys and compare responses
|
-Self
-All
staff
|
Administer
in January 2013 and December of 2013
|
-survey
monkey online resource
|
-Use
data to find perceived strengths and weaknesses of the PBIS program-Devise
ideas to possibly increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share
findings during Fall 2013 in-service day.
-Determine
if/how changes affected staff perception of PBIS in second survey.
-In case staff data is skewed in
comparison to data, I will also focus on district walkthrough data
|
3. Analyze data from two previous school
years.
-Look for patterns or trends in the
2011-2012 school year behavior data.
-Document and share this information
with site supervisor and Behavior Interventionist.
|
-Self
-Site Supervisor
-Behavior Interventionist
|
December 2012 / January 2013
|
-CogNos Data
|
-Find trends that may be issues to
compare to current year data.
-Get feedback from site supervisor
and Behavior Interventionist.
|
4. Analyze data from current school year.
-Look for patterns or trends in the
2012-2013 school year behavior data.
-Document and share this information
with site supervisor and Behavior Interventionist.
|
-Self
-Site Supervisor
-Behavior Interventionist
|
May 2013 / June 2013
|
-CogNos Data
|
-Find trends that may be issues to
compare to current year data.
-Get feedback from site supervisor
and Behavior Interventionist.
|
5. Determine correlation between PBIS
and number of referrals in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 school years.
-Collect
discipline data from the district online system from previous school year and
current school year.
-Break
down data based on subpopulations (ethnicity, grade level, location type of infraction,
overall list of students, time of day.
-Break
down data based on behaviors and locations on campus incidents are
occurring.
|
-Self
-Behavioral
Interventionist
-Site
Supervisor
-PBIS
committee
|
-May
2013 / June 2013
|
-CogNos
access for discipline information
|
-Use
of data to identify patterns, trends, and areas of concern.
-Devise
ideas to possibly increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share
findings with PBIS committee
-Devise
ideas with PBIS committee.
-Share
findings during Fall 2013 in-service day.
|
6.
Create presentation for PBIS committee.
-Give background on where my inquiry
came about
-Share my action research process
-Share data findings and assertions
based on data
-Give my final thoughts
-Come up with ideas to present to
staff at in-service
|
-Self
-PBIS committee
-Site supervisor
|
-June 2013 / August 2013
|
-Power point
-CogNos Data
-staff survey data
|
-Based on my sharing, the committee
will suggest new structures to best meet the needs of students and staff at
Tipps.
|
7.
Present findings with committee to 2013-2014 staff.
-Give background on where my inquiry
came about
-Share my action research process
-Share data findings and assertions
based on data
-Give my final thoughts
|
-Self
-PBIS committee
-Staff
|
August 2013
|
-Power point
-CogNos Data
-staff survey data
|
-Based on my sharing, the committee
will suggest new structures to best meet the needs of students and staff at
Tipps.
-Staff will contribute their input on
possible changes as well.
-Staff determines new changes, if
any.
|
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
7.1 Tool Outline
Nick Clackley Action Research Outline
|
||||
Goal: Measure the effectiveness of PBIS implementation at Tipps Elementary
in Houston, Texas.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1. Determine staff perception of PBIS
-Create online survey for
staff to give their perception of PBIS program
-Administer survey in
January to get baseline.
-Administer survey in
December to find out if perceptions changed based on shared findings.
-Collect and analyze
feedback from surveys and compare responses
|
-Self
-All staff
|
Administer in January 2013
and December of 2013
|
-survey monkey online
resource
|
-Use data to find
perceived strengths and weaknesses of the PBIS program
-Devise ideas to possibly
increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share findings during
Fall 2013 in-service day.
-Determine if/how changes
affected staff perception of PBIS in second survey.
|
2. Determine correlation between PBIS and number of
referrals in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 school years.
-Collect discipline data
from the district online system from previous school year and current school
year.
-Break down data based on
subpopulations (gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and grade
level)
-Break down data based on
behaviors and locations on campus incidents are occurring.
|
-Self
-Behavioral
Interventionist
-Site Supervisor
|
-September 2011 / June
2013
|
-CogNos access for
discipline information
|
-Use of data to identify
patterns, trends, and areas of concern.
-Devise ideas to possibly
increase effectiveness in classrooms.
-Share findings during
Fall 2013 in-service day.
|
3.
Create presentation for staff.
-Give background on where my inquiry
came about
-Share my action research process
-Share data findings and assertions
based on data
-Give my final thoughts
-Create an activity for staff to
develop or change PBIS structures to meet the needs of students and staff at
Tipps.
|
-Self
-PBIS committee
-Site supervisor
|
-June 2013 / August 2013
|
-Power point
-CogNos Data
-staff survey data
|
-Based on my sharing, the teachers
create or changes PBIS structure to best meet the needs of students and staff
at Tipps.
|
4.
Research history and literature of PBIS program.
-Look for Positives
-Look for downfalls
|
-Self
|
December 2012 / January 2013
|
-Internet access
-Region IV website
|
-Find information to support the good
this program can do for behavior management.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)